Revision History
B |
Updated Appendix Q |
28 February 2020 |
A |
First Submission |
13 December 2019 |
Rev. |
Description of Modification |
Date |
Contents
2. Marine Water Quality Monitoring
8. Summary of Monitoring Exceedance, Complaints, Notification of Summons and Prosecutions
11. Conclusion and Recommendations
Appendix A |
|
Appendix B |
Summary of Implementation Status of Environmental Mitigation |
Appendix C |
|
Appendix D |
|
Appendix E |
|
Appendix F |
|
Appendix G |
|
Appendix H |
|
Appendix I |
|
Appendix J |
|
Appendix K |
|
Appendix L |
|
Appendix M |
|
Appendix N |
|
Appendix O |
|
Appendix P |
|
Appendix Q |
Executive Summary
Introduction
A1. The Project, Integrated Waste Management Facility (IWMF), is a Designated Project under the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (Cap. 499) (EIAO) and is currently governed by a Further Environmental Permit (FEP No. FEP-01/429/2012/A) for the construction and operation of the Project.
A2. In accordance with the Updated Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Manual for the Project, EM&A works for marine water quality, noise, waste management and ecology should be carried out by Environmental Team (ET), Acuity Sustainability Consulting Limited (ASCL), during the construction phase of the Project.
A3. This is the 17th Monthly EM&A Report, prepared by ASCL, for the Project summarizing the monitoring results and audit findings of the EM&A programme at and around Shek Kwu Chau (SKC) during the reporting period from 1 November 2019 to 30 November 2019 and exceedance investigation finding for 2 October 2019.
Summary of Main Works Undertaken & Key Mitigation Measures Implemented
A4. Key activities carried out in this reporting period for the Project included the following:
· Sand Blanket Laying
· Cone Penetration Test
· DCM Installation Works
· Coring of DCM cluster
· Installation of Caisson
· Dredging and Sediment Disposal
A5. The major environmental impacts brought by the above construction activities include:
· Water quality impact from DCM installation
· Disturbance and possible trapping of Finless Porpoise by silt curtains
A6. The key environmental mitigation measures implemented for the Project in this reporting period associated with the construction activities include:
· Reduction of noise from equipment and machinery on-site;
· Installation of silt curtains for DCM installation;
· Installation process of silt curtain according to approved Silt Curtain Deployment Plan;
· Sorting, recycling, storage and disposal of general refuse and construction waste;
· Management of chemicals and avoidance of oil spillage on-site;
· Implementation of cluster MMEZ (Marine Mammal Exclusion Zone) and inspection of enclosed environment within silt curtains as per DMPFP (Detailed Monitoring Programme of Finless Porpoise);
· Daily site audit and monitoring by ET during dredging work as stipulated in FEP Clause 2.21A;
· Regulation on rate and means for dredging works as stipulated in FEP Clause 2.17 – 2.21 or the approved Supporting Document for Reviewing Dredging Rate and Filling Rate, whichever is applicable;
· Storage, handling and disposal of dredged materials according to Dumping At Sea Ordinance (DASO);
· Confirmation of the absence of silt content in the rock filling material and the filling work is properly conducted.
Summary of Exceedance & Investigation & Follow-up
A7. The EM&A works for construction noise, water quality, construction waste, marine mammal and White-Bellied Sea Eagle (WBSE) were conducted during the reporting period in accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual.
A8. No exceedance of the Action or Limit Levels in relation to the construction noise, construction waste and WBSE monitoring was recorded in the reporting month.
A9. Twenty-nine (29) of the General & Regular DCM water quality monitoring results of suspended solids (SS) obtained during the reporting period had exceeded Action Level. One (1) of SS monitoring result had exceeded the relevant Limit Level during the reporting period. One hundred & fifty-four (154) of the General & Regular DCM water quality monitoring results of dissolved oxygen (DO) obtained during the reporting period had exceeded Action Level. None (0) of DO monitoring results had exceeded the relevant Limit Level during the reporting period. Investigation was immediately carried out accordingly. The exceedances were found to be unrelated to the Project.
A10. No project-related Action Level & Limit Level exceedance was recorded on 2 October 2019 and from 1 November to 30 November 2019.
A11. Weekly site inspections of the construction work by ET were carried out on 4, 15, 19 & 26 November 2019 to audit the mitigation measures implementation status. Monthly joint site inspection was carried out on 19 November 2019 by ET and IEC. Observations were recorded in the site inspection checklists and provided to the contractors together with the appropriate follow-up actions where necessary.
Complaint Handling and Prosecution
A12. No project-related environmental complaint was received during the reporting period.
A13. Neither notifications of summons nor prosecution was received for the Project.
Reporting Change
A14. There was no change to be reported that may affect the on-going EM&A programme.
Summary of Upcoming Key Issues and Key Mitigation Measures
A15. Key activities anticipated in the next reporting period for the Project will include the following:
· DCM Installation Works;
· Coring of DCM samples;
· Cone Penetration Test;
· Dredging Works and Sediment Disposal;
· Rock Filling of Foundation;
· Leveling Works for the Foundation of Seawall and Berth Area;
· Caisson Laying;
· Rubble Mound Laying;
· Sand Blanket and Geotextile Laying.
A16. The major environmental impacts brought by the above construction activities will include:
· Water quality impact from the DCM installation, laying of sand blanket and dredging operation;
· Disturbance and possible trapping of Finless Porpoise by silt curtains.
A17. The key environmental mitigation measures for the Project in the coming reporting period associated with the construction activities will include:
· Reduction of noise from equipment and machinery on-site;
· Installation of silt curtains for DCM installation, sand blanket laying works and dredging works;
· Installation process of floating silt curtain according to approved Silt Curtain Deployment Plan;
· Sorting, recycling, storage and disposal of general refuse and construction waste;
· Management of chemicals and avoidance of oil spillage on-site, especially under heavy rains and adverse weather;
· Implementation of cluster MMEZ and inspection of enclosed environment within silt curtains as per DMPFP;
· Regulation on rate and means for dredging works as stipulated in FEP Clause 2.17 – 2.21 or the approved Supporting Document for Reviewing Dredging Rate and Filling Rate, whichever is applicable;
· Daily site audit and monitoring by ET during dredging work as stipulated in FEP Clause 2.21A;
· Storage, handling and disposal of dredged materials according to Dumping At Sea Ordinance (DASO);
· Confirmation of the absence of silt content in the rock filling material and the filling work is properly conducted.
· Ground Treatment works;
· Seawall and Breakwater construction;
· Non-dredged Reclamation;
· Other Marine works and Harbour and Port Facilities;
· Site formation;
· Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Treatment Processes;
· Energy Recovery for Power Generation and Surplus Electricity export;
· Wastewater treatment process;
· Desalination and water treatment process;
· Civil works;
· Building and Structural works;
· Electrical and Mechanical works;
· Building Services;
· Architectural and Landscaping works; and
· All other design and works required for the operation and maintenance of the Facility according to the Contract requirements.
1.1.4 The location of the IWMF near Shek Kwu Chau (SKC) and general layout of IWMF are shown in Figure 1.1 and Figure 1.2 respectively.
|
Figure 1.1 Location of the IWMF at the Artificial Island near SKC |
|
Figure 1.2 General Layout of the IWMF at the Artificial Island near SKC |
Table 1.1 Contact Details of Key Personnel
Party |
Position |
Name |
Telephone no. |
Keppel Seghers – Zhen Hua Joint Venture |
Project Manager |
Kenny Yu |
2192-0606 |
Acuity Sustainability Consulting Limited |
Environmental Team Leader |
Robin Ho |
2698-6833 |
ERM-Hong Kong, Limited |
Independent Environmental Checker |
Mandy To |
2271-3000 |
Table 1.2 Summary of the Construction Activities Undertaken during the Reporting Month
Location of works |
Construction activities undertaken |
Remarks on progress |
Breakwater |
· Sand blanket laying
· DCM installation |
· On-going
· On-going |
Seawall portion |
· DCM installation
· Coring for DCM cluster
· Dredging and Sediment Disposal
· Cone Penetration Test
· Installation of caisson |
· 6420 out of 6491 DCM injections were completed
· On-going
· 36,791.8842 m3 of dredged sediment in bulk quantity was dumped at relevant dumping site in total up to 30 November 2019.
· On-going
· On-going |
Table 1.3 Summary of the Status of Valid Environmental Licence, Notification, Permit and Documentations
Permit/ Licences/ Notification |
Reference |
Validity Period |
Remarks |
Variation of Environmental Permit |
EP-429/2012/A |
Throughout the Contract |
|
Further Environmental Permit |
FEP-01/429/2012/A |
Throughout the Contract |
|
Notification of Construction Works under the Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation (Form NA) |
Ref No.: 428778 |
15/12/2017 –22/09/2024 |
|
Wastewater Discharge Licence |
WT00033787-2019 |
22/08/2019 – 31/08/2024 |
|
Chemical Waste Producer Registration |
WPN0017-933-K3301-01 |
Throughout the Contract |
|
WPN5213-961-K3301-02 |
Throughout the Contract |
|
|
Construction Noise Permit (24 hours) |
GW-RS0815-19 |
16/09/2019 – 12/03/2020 |
|
GW-RS0938-19 |
29/10/2019 – 27/04/2020 |
||
Billing Account for Disposal of Construction Waste |
A/C No.:7029768 |
Throughout the Contract |
|
Marine Dumping Permit |
EP/MD/20-051 |
20/08/2019 – 19/02/2020 |
|
Table 1.4 Summary of Status for Key Environmental Aspects under the Updated EM&A Manual
1.5.3 Other than the EM&A work by ET, environmental briefings, trainings and regular environmental management meetings were conducted, in order to enhance environmental awareness and closely monitor the environmental performance of the contractors. 1.5.4 The EM&A programme has been implemented in accordance with the recommendations presented in the approved EIA Report and the Updated EM&A Manual. A summary of implementation status of the environmental mitigation measures for the construction phase of the Project during the reporting period is provided in Appendix B.Table 2.1 Water Quality Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration
Parameter, unit |
Frequency |
No. of Depths |
· Water Depth (m) · Temperature (oC) · Salinity (ppt) · pH (pH unit) · Dissolved Oxygen (DO) (mg/L and % of saturation) · Turbidity (NTU) · Suspended Solids (SS), mg/L · Total alkalinity (mg/L) · Current velocity (m/s) · Direction |
General water quality monitoring and Regular DCM monitoring: 3 days per week, at mid-flood and mid-ebb tides |
3 water depths: 1m below sea surface, mid-depth and 1m above sea bed. If the water depth is less than 3m, mid-depth sampling only. If water depth less than 6m, mid-depth may be omitted.
|
|
Figure 2.1 Water monitoring locations at Artificial Island near SKC |
Table 2.2 - Locations of Marine Water Quality Stations
Monitoring station |
Description |
Easting |
Northing |
B1 |
Beach - Cheung Sha Lower |
813342 |
810316 |
B2 |
Beach - Pui O |
815340 |
811025 |
B3 |
Beach - Yi Long Wan |
817210 |
808395 |
B4 |
Beach - Tai Long Wan |
817784 |
808682 |
H1 |
Horseshoe Crab - Shek Kwu Chau |
816477 |
806953 |
C1 |
Control Station (note i) |
810850 |
806288 |
C1A |
Relocated Control Station |
812823 |
806300 |
C2 |
Control Station (note ii) |
819421 |
808053 |
C2A |
Relocated Control Station |
818869 |
806808 |
F1 |
Cheung Sha Wan Fish Culture Zone (note iii) |
818631 |
810966 |
F1A |
Cheung Sha Wan Fish Culture Zone |
819109 |
810924 |
S1 |
Submarine Cable Landing Site |
814245 |
810335 |
S2 |
Submarine Cable (note iv) |
815076 |
807747 |
S2A |
Submarine Cable |
814808 |
808515 |
S3 |
Submarine Cable Landing Site |
816420 |
805621 |
CR1 |
Coral |
817144 |
805597 |
CR2 |
Coral |
816512 |
805882 |
M1 |
Tung Wan |
821572 |
807799 |
i. Relocated to C1A in Mar 2019
ii. Relocated to C2A in Mar 2019
iii. Relocated to S2A in Mar 2019
iv. Relocated to F1A in Mar 2019
2.4 Impact Monitoring Methodology 2.4.1 General and regular DCM water quality monitoring was conducted three days per week, at mid-flood and mid-ebb tides, at the designated water quality monitoring stations during the reporting period. 2.4.2 The interval between 2 sets of monitoring was not less than 36 hours. Sampling was collected at three water depths, namely, 1m below water surface, mid-depth and 1m above seabed, except where the water depth is less than 6m, the mid-depth was omitted. If the water depth was less than 3m, only the mid-depth station was monitored. 2.4.3 All observations and results were recorded in the data record sheets in Appendix D. Duplicate in-situ measurements and water sampling were carried out in each sampling event. The monitoring probes were retrieved out of water after the first measurement and then redeployed for the second measurement. When the difference in value between the first and second readings of DO or turbidity is more than 25% of the value of the first reading, the reading would be discarded and further readings would be taken.In-situ Measurement
2.4.4 Levels of DO, pH, temperature, turbidity and salinity would be measured in-situ by portable and weatherproof measuring instrument, e.g. YSI ProDSS and Horiba U-53 Multiparameter complete with cable and sensor. (Refer to http://www.ysi.com/ProDSS for YSI ProDSS technical specification and http://www.horiba.com/process-environmental/products/water-treatment-environment/details/u-50-multiparameter-water-quality-checker-368/ for Horiba U-53 technical specification ). Water current velocity and Water Current direction would be measured by portable and weatherproof current meter, e.g. SonTek Hydrosurveyor (Refer to https://www.sontek.com/media/pdfs/riversurveyor-s5-m9-brochure.pdf for SonTek Hydrosurveyor M9 technical specification). Parameters measured by in-situ measurement is tabulated in Table 2.3Table 2.3 - Parameters Measured by In-situ Measurement
Parameter |
Resolution |
Range |
Temperature |
0.1 oC |
-5-70 oC |
Dissolved Oxygen (DO) |
0.01 mg/L |
0-50.0 mg/L |
Turbidity |
0.1 NTU |
0-1000 NTU |
pH |
pH 0.01 |
pH 0-14 |
Salinity |
0.01 ppt |
0-40 ppt |
Water Current Velocity |
0.001m/s |
±20m/s |
Water Current Direction |
±1o |
±2o |
Laboratory Analysis
2.4.5 Analysis of Total Alkalinity and SS shall be carried out in a HOKLAS accredited laboratory, as shown in Appendix E. Sufficient water samples shall be collected at the monitoring stations for carrying out the laboratory determinations. The determination work shall be started within 24 hours after collection of the water samples. Analytical methods and detection limits for SS and total alkalinity are presented in Table 2.4.Table 2.4 - Analytical Methods Applied to Water Quality Samples
Parameter |
Analytical method |
Detection Level |
Suspended Solids, SS |
APHA 2540 Di |
1 mg/L |
Total Alkalinity |
APHA 2320 |
0.01 mg/L |
i. "APHA 2540 D" stands for American Public Health Association Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 23rd Edition.
Field Log
2.4.6 Other relevant data was recorded, such as: monitoring location / position, time, water depth, weather conditions and any special phenomena underway near the monitoring station. 2.5 Monitoring Equipment 2.5.1 Equipment used in the impact water quality monitoring programme is summarized in Table 2.5 below. Calibration certificates for the water quality monitoring equipment are attached in Appendix F.Table 2.5 Impact Water Quality Monitoring Equipment
Monitored Parameter |
Equipment |
Brand and Model |
DO, Temperature, Salinity, pH and Turbidity |
Multi-functional Meter |
YSI ProDSS Horiba U-53 |
Coordinates |
Positioning Equipment |
Garmin GPSMAP 78s |
Water depth |
Water Depth Detector |
Hummingbird 160 Portable |
SS |
Water Sampler |
Wildco 2 L Water Sampler with messenger |
The instrument is a portable and weatherproof DO probe mounted on the multi-functional meter complete with cable and sensor and is powered by a DC supply source. The equipment was capable of measuring:
l A DO level in the range of 0 ‑ 50 mg/L; and
l Temperature of -5 ‑ 70 degree Celsius.
2.5.3 Turbidity Measurement InstrumentThe instrument is a portable and weatherproof turbidity-measuring probe mounted on the multi-functional meter and is powered by a DC supply source. The instrument is equipped with a photoelectric sensor which is capable of measuring turbidity between 0 - 1000 NTU.
2.5.4 pH Measurement InstrumentThe probe consists of a potentiometer, a glass electrode, a reference electrode and a temperature-compensating device mounted on the multi-functional meter. It is readable to 0.1 pH in a range of 0 to 14. Standard buffer solutions of at least pH 7 and pH 10 were used for calibration of the instrument before and after use.
2.5.5 Salinity Measurement InstrumentA portable salinometer mounted on the multi-functional meter capable of measuring salinity in the range of 0-40 parts per thousand (ppt) was provided for measuring salinity of the water at each monitoring location.
2.5.6 SamplerThe water sampler comprises a transparent PVC cylinder, with a capacity of not less than 2 litres, which can be effectively sealed with latex cups at both ends. The sampler has a positive latching system to keep it open and prevent premature closure until released by a messenger when the sampler is at the selected water depth.
2.5.7 Sample Containers and StorageWater samples for SS were stored in high density polythene bottles with no preservative added, packed in ice (cooled to 4°C without being frozen) and delivered to the laboratory and analysed as soon as possible after collection. Sufficient volume of samples was collected to achieve the detection limit stated in Table 2.4.
2.5.8 Water Depth DetectorA portable, battery-operated echo sounder was used for the determination of water depth at each designated monitoring station. This unit could either be hand-held or affixed to the bottom of the work boat, if the same vessel is to be used throughout the monitoring programme.
2.5.9 Monitoring Position EquipmentHand-held digital Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS) with way point bearing indication and Radio Technical Commission for maritime (RTCM) Type 16 error message ‘screen pop-up’ facilities (for real-time auto-display of error messages and DGPS corrections from the Hong Kong Hydrographic Office) was provided and used to ensure that the water sampling locations were correct during the water quality monitoring work.
2.6 Maintenance and Calibration 2.6.1 The multi-functional meters were checked and calibrated before use. Multi-functional meters were certified by a laboratory accredited under HOKLAS or any other international accreditation scheme, and subsequently re-calibrated at three monthly intervals throughout all stages of the water quality monitoring. Responses of sensors and electrodes were checked with certified standard solutions before each use. Wet bulb calibration for a DO meter was carried out before commencement of monitoring and after completion of all measurements each day. Calibration was not conducted at each monitoring location as daily calibration is adequate for the type of DO meter employed. 2.6.2 Sufficient stocks of spare parts were provided and maintained for replacements when necessary. Backup monitoring equipment was prepared for uninterrupted monitoring during equipment maintenance or calibration during monitoring.Table 2.6 Criteria of Action and Limit Levels for Water Quality
Parameters |
Action |
Limit |
Construction Phase Impact Monitoring |
||
DO in mg/L |
≤ 5 %-ile of baseline data |
≤ 4 |
SS in mg/L |
≥ 95 %-ile of baseline data or 120% of control station’s SS at the same tide of the same day of measurement, whichever is higher |
≥ 99 %-ile of baseline data or 130% of control station's SS at the same tide of the same day of measurement, whichever is higher |
Turbidity in NTU |
≥ 95 %-ile of baseline data or 120% of control station’s turbidity at the same tide of the same day of measurement, whichever is higher |
≥ 99 %-ile of baseline data or 130% of control station's turbidity at the same tide of the same day of measurement, whichever is higher |
Temperature in°C |
1.8°C above the temperature recorded at representative control station at the same tide of the same day |
2°C above the temperature recorded at representative control station at the same tide of the same day |
Total Alkalinity in mg/L |
≥ 95 %-ile of baseline data or 120% of representative control station at the same tide of the same day, whichever is higher |
≥ 99 %-ile of baseline data or 130% of representative control station at the same tide of the same day, whichever is higher |
Table 2.7 Derived Action and Limit Levels for Water Quality Monitoring (Dry Season)
Parameters |
Action |
Limit |
Construction Phase Impact Monitoring |
||
DO in mg/L |
≤ 7.13 |
≤ 4 |
SS in mg/L |
≥ 8 or 120% of control station’s SS at the same tide of the same day of measurement, whichever is higher |
≥ 10 or 130% of control station's SS at the same tide of the same day of measurement, whichever is higher |
Turbidity in NTU |
≥ 5.6 or 120% of control station’s turbidity at the same tide of the same day of measurement, whichever is higher |
≥ 12.8 or 130% of control station's turbidity at the same tide of the same day of measurement, whichever is higher |
Temperature in°C |
1.8°C above the temperature recorded at representative control station at the same tide of the same day |
2°C above the temperature recorded at representative control station at the same tide of the same day |
Total Alkalinity in mg/L |
≥116 or 120% of control station’s Total Alkalinity at the same tide of the same day of measurement, whichever is higher |
≥ 118 or 130% of control station’s Total Alkalinity at the same tide of the same day of measurement, whichever is higher |
Notes:
i. "Depth-averaged" is calculated by taking the arithmetic means of reading of all three depths.
ii. For DO, non-compliance of the water quality limits occurs when monitoring result is lower than the limits.
iii. For turbidity, SS and Salinity, non-compliance of the water quality limits occurs when monitoring result is higher than the limits.
Table 2.8 Derived Action and Limit Levels for Water Quality (Wet Season)
Parameters |
Action |
Limit |
Construction Phase Impact Monitoring |
||
DO in mg/L |
≤ 5.28 |
≤ 4 |
SS in mg/L |
≥ 12 or 120% of control station’s SS at the same tide of the same day of measurement, whichever is higher |
≥ 14 or 130% of control station's SS at the same tide of the same day of measurement, whichever is higher |
Turbidity in NTU |
≥ 4.0 or 120% of control station’s turbidity at the same tide of the same day of measurement, whichever is higher |
≥ 4.3 or 130% of control station's turbidity at the same tide of the same day of measurement, whichever is higher |
Temperature in°C |
1.8°C above the temperature recorded at representative control station at the same tide of the same day |
2°C above the temperature recorded at representative control station at the same tide of the same day |
Total Alkalinity in mg/L
|
≥ 116 mg/L or 120% of representative control station at the same tide of the same day, whichever is higher |
≥ 118 mg/L or 130% of representative control station at the same tide of the same day, whichever is higher
|
Notes:
i. "Depth-averaged" is calculated by taking the arithmetic means of reading of all three depths.
ii. For DO, non-compliance of the water quality limits occurs when monitoring result is lower than the limits.
iii. For turbidity, SS and Salinity, non-compliance of the water quality limits occurs when monitoring result is higher than the limits.
2.7.3 If exceedances were found during water quality monitoring, the actions in accordance with the Event and Action Plan shall be carried out according to Appendix G. 2.8 Monitoring Results and Observations 2.8.1 During the reporting period, general water quality monitoring at all the eleven monitoring stations and regular DCM monitoring including monitoring stations S1, S2A and S3 were conducted on 1, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 18, 20, 22, 25, 27 & 29 November 2019. Monitoring results of 7 key parameters: Salinity, DO, turbidity, SS, pH, temperature and total alkalinity in this reporting month, are summarized in Table 2.9, and details results are presented in Appendix D.Table 2.9 Summary of Impact Water Quality Monitoring Results
Locations |
Parameters |
||||||||
Salinity (ppt) |
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L) |
pH |
Turbidity (NTU) |
Suspended Solids (mg/L) |
Temp.(oC) |
Total Alkalinity (mg/L) note ii |
|||
Surface & Middle |
Bottom |
||||||||
B1 |
Avg. |
30.25 |
7.16 |
7.19 |
7.98 |
3.0 |
7.37 |
26.1 |
113.4 |
Min. |
27.97 |
6.43 |
6.34 |
7.74 |
1.9 |
2.00 |
21.4 |
110.0 |
|
Max. |
31.88 |
7.96 |
7.96 |
8.42 |
4.0 |
21.00 |
28.4 |
117.0 |
|
B2 |
Avg. |
30.21 |
7.12 |
7.15 |
7.98 |
3.0 |
7.27 |
26.1 |
113.4 |
Min. |
28.06 |
6.28 |
6.45 |
7.71 |
2.1 |
2.00 |
21.5 |
109.0 |
|
Max. |
31.87 |
7.85 |
7.98 |
8.49 |
4.2 |
19.00 |
28.5 |
117.0 |
|
B3 |
Avg. |
30.25 |
7.19 |
7.18 |
7.99 |
3.1 |
7.26 |
26.2 |
113.3 |
Min. |
28.13 |
6.26 |
6.52 |
7.73 |
2.0 |
2.00 |
21.2 |
110.0 |
|
Max. |
31.94 |
7.97 |
7.95 |
8.47 |
4.2 |
17.00 |
28.4 |
117.0 |
|
B4 |
Avg. |
30.26 |
7.18 |
7.16 |
8.00 |
3.1 |
7.37 |
26.2 |
113.3 |
Min. |
27.95 |
6.69 |
6.41 |
7.75 |
1.9 |
2.00 |
21.6 |
109.0 |
|
Max. |
31.89 |
8.01 |
7.84 |
8.47 |
4.0 |
19.00 |
28.4 |
117.0 |
|
C1A |
Avg. |
30.24 |
7.14 |
7.13 |
8.00 |
2.9 |
7.35 |
26.0 |
113.4 |
Min. |
27.82 |
6.22 |
6.40 |
7.71 |
2.0 |
2.00 |
21.1 |
108.0 |
|
Max. |
32.04 |
8.00 |
7.86 |
8.50 |
3.9 |
21.00 |
28.5 |
117.0 |
|
C2A |
Avg. |
30.26 |
7.15 |
7.20 |
7.99 |
2.9 |
7.24 |
26.1 |
113.4 |
Min. |
27.81 |
6.38 |
6.54 |
7.75 |
2.0 |
2.00 |
21.1 |
110.0 |
|
Max. |
32.05 |
7.88 |
7.92 |
8.54 |
4.2 |
22.00 |
28.4 |
117.0 |
|
CR1 |
Avg. |
30.24 |
7.18 |
7.16 |
7.98 |
2.9 |
7.45 |
26.1 |
113.5 |
Min. |
27.83 |
6.58 |
6.46 |
7.72 |
1.9 |
2.00 |
21.2 |
110.0 |
|
Max. |
32.03 |
7.89 |
7.89 |
8.53 |
4.0 |
19.00 |
28.4 |
117.0 |
|
CR2 |
Avg. |
30.25 |
7.12 |
7.14 |
7.99 |
2.9 |
7.42 |
26.2 |
113.5 |
Min. |
27.84 |
6.45 |
6.38 |
7.75 |
1.9 |
2.00 |
21.6 |
110.0 |
|
Max. |
32.01 |
7.91 |
7.88 |
8.48 |
4.1 |
22.00 |
28.4 |
117.0 |
|
F1A |
Avg. |
30.22 |
7.16 |
7.15 |
8.00 |
3.0 |
7.46 |
26.2 |
113.4 |
Min. |
27.79 |
6.35 |
6.31 |
7.73 |
2.1 |
2.00 |
21.6 |
110.0 |
|
Max. |
32.03 |
7.92 |
7.88 |
8.53 |
4.2 |
20.00 |
28.3 |
117.0 |
|
H1 |
Avg. |
30.24 |
7.17 |
7.14 |
7.98 |
3.0 |
7.71 |
26.1 |
113.3 |
Min. |
27.83 |
6.42 |
6.34 |
7.72 |
2.1 |
2.00 |
21.2 |
110.0 |
|
Max. |
32.02 |
7.98 |
7.92 |
8.43 |
4.2 |
22.00 |
28.5 |
116.0 |
|
M1 |
Avg. |
30.23 |
7.15 |
7.17 |
8.01 |
2.9 |
7.58 |
26.2 |
113.5 |
Min. |
27.84 |
6.42 |
6.50 |
7.74 |
1.9 |
2.00 |
21.8 |
109.0 |
|
Max. |
31.94 |
7.91 |
7.73 |
8.50 |
4.1 |
16.00 |
28.4 |
117.0 |
|
S1
|
Avg. |
30.27 |
7.17 |
7.14 |
8.00 |
3.0 |
7.26 |
26.1 |
113.3 |
Min. |
27.87 |
6.46 |
6.46 |
7.72 |
2.0 |
2.00 |
21.3 |
109.0 |
|
Max. |
31.97 |
7.99 |
7.80 |
8.41 |
4.1 |
18.00 |
28.4 |
117.0 |
|
S2A
|
Avg. |
30.24 |
7.17 |
7.12 |
7.99 |
2.9 |
7.28 |
26.2 |
113.4 |
Min. |
27.80 |
6.44 |
6.35 |
7.73 |
2.0 |
2.00 |
21.4 |
110.0 |
|
Max. |
31.93 |
7.90 |
7.74 |
8.41 |
4.0 |
20.00 |
28.4 |
118.0 |
|
S3
|
Avg. |
30.26 |
7.16 |
7.15 |
8.01 |
3.0 |
7.22 |
26.2 |
113.5 |
Min. |
27.92 |
6.40 |
6.71 |
7.74 |
1.9 |
2.00 |
21.7 |
110.0 |
|
Max. |
32.01 |
7.92 |
7.92 |
8.49 |
4.3 |
17.00 |
28.4 |
117.0 |
Notes:
i. "Avg", “Min” and “Max” is the average, minimum and maximum respectively of the data from measurements conducted under mid-flood and mid-ebb tides at three water depths, except that of DO where the data for “Surface & Middle” and “Bottom” are calculated separately.
ii. Total alkalinity test is only conducted on DCM working day with reference to master programme in Appendix A.
iii. Monitoring at S1, S2A and S3 shall only be conducted during DCM work period referring to master programme in Appendix A.
2.8.2 The weather conditions during the monitoring period were mainly sunny and cloudy. Sea conditions for the majority of monitoring days were mainly moderate. No major pollution source and extreme weather which might affect the results were observed during the impact monitoring. 2.8.3 During the impact monitoring period for November 2019, twenty-nine (29) of the General & Regular DCM water quality monitoring results of suspended solids (SS) obtained during the reporting period had exceeded Action Level. One (1) of monitoring result had exceeded the relevant Limit Level of suspended solids (SS) during the reporting period. 2.8.4 One hundred & fifty-four (154) of the General & Regular DCM water quality monitoring results of dissolved oxygen (DO) obtained during the reporting period had exceeded Action Level. None (0) of monitoring results had exceeded the relevant Limit Level of dissolved oxygen (DO) during the reporting period. 2.8.5 Investigation was carried out immediately for the exceedance case. The finding had shown that the exceedances were unrelated to the Project. However, environmental deficiencies of the Contractor on the implementation of silt curtain deployment system were spotted. Details of the exceedance are presented in Section 8. 2.8.6 Mitigation measures minimizing the adverse impacts on water implemented are listed in the implementation schedule given in Appendix B.3. Noise Monitoring 3.1 Monitoring Requirements 3.1.1 To ensure no adverse noise impact, noise monitoring is recommended to be carried out at the nearby noise sensitive receivers (NSRs) during construction phase. 3.1.2 In accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual, baseline noise level at the noise monitoring stations was established as presented in the Baseline Monitoring Report. Impact noise monitoring was conducted once per week in the form of 30-minutes measurements Leq, L10 and L90 levels recorded at each monitoring station between 0700 and 1900 hours on normal weekdays. 3.1.3 In accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual, additional weekly impact monitoring should be carried out during respective restricted hours period (1900 – 0700 hours) if the construction works were conducted at evening and night time. Additional weekly noise monitoring was conducted once per week in the form of 5-minutes measurements Leq, L10 and L90 levels recorded at each monitoring station between 1900 and 0700 hours as well as public holidays and Sundays. 3.2 Noise Monitoring Parameters, Time, Frequency 3.2.1 Impact noise monitoring was conducted weekly in the reporting period between 0700-1900 hours on normal weekdays. Additional impact noise monitoring was conducted weekly in the reporting period between 1900-0700 hours on all days as well as public holidays and Sundays. 3.2.2 Construction noise level measured in terms of the A-weighted equivalent continuous sound pressure level (LAeq). Leq 30min was used as the monitoring parameter for the time period between 0700 and 1900 hours on normal weekdays. Leq 5mins was used as the monitoring parameter for the time period between 1900 and 0700 hours as well as public holidays and Sundays. Table 3.1 summarizes the monitoring parameters, frequency and duration of the impact noise monitoring and additional impact noise monitoring. The monitoring schedule is provided in Appendix C.
Table 3.1 Noise Monitoring Parameters, Time, Frequency and Duration
Monitoring Station |
Time |
Duration |
Parameters |
M1/ N_S1, M2/ N_S2, M3/ N_S3 |
Day time: 0700-1900 hrs (during normal weekdays) |
Once per week Leq 5min/Leq 30min (average of 6 consecutive Leq 5min) |
Leq, L10 & L90 |
M1/ N_S1, M2/ N_S2, M3/ N_S3 |
Evening time: 1900-2300 hrs (including normal weekdays, also public holidays and Sundays) |
Once per week Leq 5min (3 sets of Leq 5min) |
Leq, L10 & L90 |
M1/ N_S1, M2/ N_S2, M3/ N_S3 |
Night time: 2300-0700 hrs (including normal weekdays, also public holidays and Sundays) |
Once per week Leq 5min (3 sets of Leq 5min) |
Leq, L10 & L90 |
Table 3.2 Noise Monitoring Location
Station |
NSR ID in EIA Report |
Noise Monitoring Location |
Type of sensitive receiver(s) |
Measurement Type |
M1 |
N_S1 |
Shek Kwu Chau Treatment & Rehabilitation Centre Hostel 1 |
Residential |
Façade |
M2 |
N_S2 |
Shek Kwu Chau Treatment & Rehabilitation Centre Hostel 2 |
Residential |
Façade |
M3 |
N_S3 |
Shek Kwu Chau Treatment & Rehabilitation Centre Hostel 3 |
Residential |
Façade |
l The microphone head of the lead level meter was normally positioned 1m exterior of the noise sensitive façade and lowered sufficiently so that the building’s external wall acts as a reflecting surface.
l The battery condition was checked to ensure good functioning of the meter.
l Parameters such as frequency weighting, the time weighting and the measurement time were set as follows:
- Frequency weight: A
- Time weighting: Fast
- Measurement time: 5 minutes
l Prior to and after noise measurement, the meter was calibrated using the calibrator for 94.0 dB at 1000Hz. If the difference in the calibration level before and after measurement is more than 1.0 dB, the measurement was considered invalid and repeat of noise measurement was required after re-calibration or repair of the equipment.
l For Noise monitoring was carried out for 30 mins by sound level meter. At the end of the monitoring period, noise levels in terms of Leq, L10 and L90 were recorded. In addition, site conditions and noise sources were recorded when the equipment were checked and inspected.
l All the monitoring data within the sound level meter system was downloaded through the computer software.
3.5 Monitoring Equipment 3.5.1 Integrated sound level meter was used for the noise monitoring. The meter shall comply with the International Electrotechnical Commission Publications 651: 1979 (Type 1) and 804: 1985 (Type 1) specifications. 3.5.2 Equipment used in the impact noise monitoring programme is summarized in Table 3.3 below. Calibration certificates for the noise monitoring equipment are attached in Appendix H.Table 3.3 Impact Noise Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Brand and Model |
Sound Level Meter |
NTi XL2 SVAN 971 |
Sound Level Meter Calibrator |
SvanTek SV33B |
l The microphone head of the sound level meter and calibrator were cleaned with a soft cloth at quarterly intervals.
l The sound level meter and calibrator were checked and calibrated at yearly intervals
l Immediately prior to and following each noise measurement the accuracy of the sound level meter shall be checked using an acoustic calibrator generating a known sound pressure level at a known frequency. Measurements may be accepted as valid only if the calibration levels from before and after the noise measurement agree to within 1.0dB.
3.7 Action and Limit Levels 3.7.1 The Action/Limit Levels in line with the criteria of Practice Note for Professional Persons (ProPECC PN 2/93) “Noise from Construction Activities – Non-statutory Controls” and Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process issued by HKSAR Environmental Protection Department [“EPD”] under the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance, Cap 499, S.16 is presented in Table 3.4.Table 3.4 Action and Limit Levels for Noise per Updated EM&A Manual
Time Period |
Action |
Limit (dB(A)) |
0700-1900 hrs on normal weekdays |
When one documented complaint is received |
75 dB(A) |
Notes: If works are to be carried out during restricted hours, the conditions stipulated in the Construction Noise Permit (CNP) issued by the Noise Control Authority have to be followed.
3.7.2 If exceedances were found during noise monitoring. The actions in accordance with the Event and Action Plan shall be carried out according to Appendix I. 3.8 Monitoring Results and Observations 3.8.1 Impact monitoring for noise impact for daytime was carried out on 4, 15, 18, 25 November 2019. Impact monitoring for noise impact for evening time and night time was carried out on 4&5, 15&16, 18&19, 25&26 November 2019. The impact noise levels at Noise Monitoring Stations at SKC (i.e. M1/ N_S1 to M3/ N_S3) are summarized in Table 3.6, Table 3.7 and Table 3.8 respectively. Details of noise monitoring results are presented in Appendix J. 3.8.2 Major construction activity, major noise source and extreme weather which might affect the results were recorded during the impact monitoring. 3.8.3 According to our field observations, the major noise source identified at the designated noise monitoring station in the reporting month are summarised in Table 3.5. No noticeable noise source was found near the monitoring stations M1 & M2.Table 3.5 Summary of Field Observation
Monitoring Station |
Major Noise Source |
M1 |
Nil |
M2 |
Nil |
M3 |
Air-conditioning units nearby, dog barking |
No data from impact monitoring during daytime has exceeded the stipulated limit level at 75 dB(A).
Table 3.6 Summary of Impact Noise Monitoring Results during Daytime (0700 – 1900 hours)
Location |
Measured Noise Level in dB(A) |
||
Range of Leq 30min |
Range of L10 5min |
Range of L90 5min |
|
M1 |
42.8 – 59.7 |
43.5 – 64.0 |
38.0 – 59.0 |
M2 |
41.7 – 61.8 |
42.5 – 64.9 |
37.6 – 58.8 |
M3 |
51.4 – 55.5 |
52.5 – 61.2 |
48.1 – 53.1 |
Table 3.7 Summary of Additional Impact Noise Monitoring Results during Evening Time (1900 – 2300 hours)
Location |
Measured Noise Level in dB(A) |
||
Range of Leq 5min |
Range of L10 5min |
Range of L90 5min |
|
M1 |
38.5 – 58.9 |
39.2 – 62.2 |
37.5 – 57.7 |
M2 |
40.9 – 65.1 |
43.8 – 69.2 |
36.9 – 59.9 |
M3 |
48.5 – 55.4 |
50.1 – 57.5 |
46.4 – 52.2 |
Table 3.8 Summary of Additional Impact Noise Monitoring Results during Night Time (2300 – 0700 hours)
Location |
Measured Noise Level in dB(A) |
||
Range of Leq 5min |
Range of L10 5min |
Range of L90 5min |
|
M1 |
39.5 – 49.2 |
40.7 – 50.7 |
37.0 – 47.8 |
M2 |
39.0 – 60.9 |
40.1 – 69.0 |
37.8 – 54.9 |
M3 |
46.8 – 53.0 |
47.9 – 54.9 |
45.1 – 51.0 |
Table 4.1 Quantities of Waste Generated from the Project during November 2019
Reporting Month |
Actual Quantities of Inert C&D Materials Generated Monthly |
Actual Quantities of C&D Wastes Generated Monthly |
||||||||||||
Total Quantity Generated |
Hard Rock and Large Broken Concrete (see Note 1) |
Reused in the Contract |
Reused in other Projects |
Disposed as Public Fill |
Imported Fill |
Metals |
Paper / cardboard packaging |
Plastics (see Note 2) |
Chemical Waste |
Others, e.g. general refuse (see Note 3) |
||||
Sand |
Public Fill |
Rock |
||||||||||||
(in ,000m3) |
(in ,000m3) |
(in ,000m3) |
(in ,000m3) |
(in ,000m3) |
(in ,000m3) |
(in ,000kg) |
(in ,000kg) |
(in ,000kg) |
(in ,000kg) |
(in ,000L) |
(in ,000m3) |
|||
November 2019 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
38.3088 |
0 |
19.3105 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0195 |
Notes: (1) Broken concrete for recycling into aggregates.
(2) Plastics refer to plastic bottles/ containers, plastic sheets/ foam from packaging materials.
(3) Use the conversion factor: 1 full load of dumping truck being equivalent to 6.5m3 by volume.
4.6 Although there is not much waste generation anticipated in the coming month from the Project, the Contractor is advised to sort and store any solid and liquid waste on-site properly prior to disposal.Table 5.1 Tagged Coral Monitoring Locations, Time and Frequency
Monitoring Location |
Monitoring Month/Year |
Frequency |
No. of Monitoring Survey |
10 selected hard coral colonies at control site / indirect impact site |
1st Month |
Weekly Survey |
4 |
2nd to 3th Months |
Monthly Survey |
2 |
|
4th Month (postponed to 5th month due to diver accident in Shek Kwu Chau in October 2018) |
Re-tagging of Coral Colonies in Indirect Impact Site after Typhoon Mangkhut |
||
4th Month (postponed to 5th month due to diver accident in Shek Kwu Chau in October 2018 and further postpone to 6th month due to adverse weather) |
Re-tagging of Coral Colonies in Control Site after Typhoon Mangkhut |
||
5th Month (postponed to 6th month due to diver accident in Shek Kwu Chau and further postponed to 7th month due to delay of re-tagging activities at both Indirect Impact Site and Control Site) |
Post Re-tagging Monthly Survey |
1 |
|
7th to 76th Months (postponed to 8th to 76th month due to diver accident in Shek Kwu Chau in October 2018) |
Quarterly Survey |
23 |
|
16 translocated hard coral colonies and 10 selected natural hard coral colonies at recipient site R3 |
1st Year |
Quarterly Survey |
4 |
|
Figure 5.1 Tagged Natural Corals at Indirect Impact Site Near SKC for re-tagging after typhoon Mangkhut |
|
Figure 5.2 Tagged Natural Corals at Control Site Near Yuen Kong Chau for re-tagging after typhoon Mangkhut |
|
Figure 5.3 Tagged Translocation Corals at Recipient Site R3 near SKC |
Table 5.2 Tagged Natural Corals during Baseline and Re-tagged Natural Corals after Typhoon Manghkut at Control Site near Yuen Long Chau
Coral # |
GPS Coordinates |
|
1 |
N22°09’45.96” |
E113°54’57.81” |
2R |
N22°11’29.12” |
E113°59’09.01” |
3 |
N22°09’45.81” |
E113°54’57.78” |
4 |
N22°09’45.70” |
E113°54’57.95” |
5R |
N22°11’29.10” |
E113°59’09.18” |
6 |
N22°09’45.75” |
E113°54’58.02” |
7R |
N22°11’29.17” |
E113°59’08.86” |
7 |
N22°09’45.65” |
E113°54’57.94” |
8 |
N22°09’45.53” |
E113°54’57.90” |
9 |
N22°09’46.23” |
E113°54’54.70” |
10R |
N22°11’29.18” |
E113°59’08.91” |
Notes:
i. The re-tagged corals were marked as ##R.
Table 5.3 Re-tagged Natural Corals after Typhoon Manghkut at Indirect Impact Site near SKC
Coral # note i |
GPS Coordinates |
|
11R |
N22°11’29.14” |
E113°59’08.92” |
12R |
N22°11’29.12” |
E113°59’09.01” |
13R |
N22°11’29.11” |
E113°59’09.07” |
14R |
N22°11’29.13” |
E113°59’09.12” |
15R |
N22°11’29.10” |
E113°59’09.18” |
16R |
N22°11’29.07” |
E113°59’09.23” |
17R |
N22°11’29.17” |
E113°59’08.86” |
18R |
N22°11’29.14” |
E113°59’08.94” |
19R |
N22°11’29.20” |
E113°59’08.81” |
20R |
N22°11’29.18” |
E113°59’08.91” |
Notes:
i. The re-tagged corals were marked as ##R.
Table 5.4 GPS Coordinates of Recipient Site R3
Site |
GPS Coordinates |
|
R3 |
N22°11’43.69” |
E113°28.99” |
5.4 Impact Monitoring Methodology 5.4.1 Health status of coral was assessed by the following criteria:
· Hard coral: Percentage of surface area exhibiting partial mortality and blanched/bleached area of each coral colony and degree of sedimentation.
5.5 Action and Limit Levels 5.5.1 Monitoring result was reviewed and compared against the below Action Level and Limit Level (AL/LL) as set with the below Table 5.5 and Table 5.6.Table 5.5 Action and Limit Levels for Construction Phase Coral Monitoring
Parameter |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
Mortality |
If during Impact Monitoring a 15% increase in the percentage of partial mortality on the corals occurs at more than 20% of the tagged indirect impact site coral colonies that is not recorded on the tagged corals at the control site, then the Action Level is exceeded. |
If during Impact Monitoring a 25% increase in the percentage of partial mortality on the corals occurs at more than 20% of the tagged indirect impact site coral colonies that is not recorded on the tagged corals at the control site, then the Limit Level is exceeded. |
Table 5.6 Action and Limit Levels for Post-Translocation Coral Monitoring
Parameter |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
Mortality |
If during Post-Translocation Monitoring a 15% increase in the percentage of partial mortality on the corals occurs at more than 20% of the translocated coral colonies that is not recorded on the original corals in the recipient site, then the Action Level is exceeded. |
If during Post-Translocation Monitoring a 25% increase in the percentage of partial mortality on the corals occurs at more than 20% of the translocated coral colonies that is not recorded on the original corals in the recipient site, then the Limit Level is exceeded. |
6. Marine Mammal 6.1 Monitoring Requirements 6.1.1 The marine mammal monitoring programme would focus on Finless Porpoise, as the study area near Shek Kwu Chau has been identified as a hotspot for this species, while the Chinese White Dolphins rarely occurred there in the past. 6.1.2 The monitoring will verify the predicted impacts on marine mammals, and examine whether the mitigation measures recommended in the EIA report have been effectively implemented to protect marine mammals from negative impacts from construction activities. 6.1.3 The Vessel-based Line-transect Survey, the Passive Acoustic Monitoring and the Land-based Theodolite Tracking will be conducted to provide systematic, quantitative measurements of occurrence, encounter rate, habitat use, movement and behavioural patterns of marine mammals within or near the Project Area during construction and operational phases. 6.1.4 The mammal monitoring works during construction consist of the following three survey methods:
· Vessel-based Line-transect Survey – to monitor the occurrence of Finless Porpoises (and Chinese White Dolphins) in the study area during construction works, by comparing with the findings of the pre-construction marine mammal monitoring;
· Passive Acoustic Monitoring – to study the usage of the Project Area and two control sites in South Lantau Waters by Finless Porpoise during construction works, in reference with the baseline findings of the pre-construction marine mammal monitoring; and
· Land-based Theodolite Tracking – to study the movement and behavioral pattern of Finless Porpoise within and around the Project Area during construction works.
6.1.5 The marine mammal observation works of Marine Mammal Exclusion Zone (MMEZ) and Marine Mammal Watching as two of the specific mitigation measures recommended in the approved EIA report shall be fully and properly implemented for the Project to minimize disturbance on Finless Porpoise during construction and operational phases. 6.2 Survey Methods 6.2.1 Vessel-based Line-transect Survey6.2.1.1 For the vessel-based marine mammal surveys, the monitoring team adopted the standard line-transect method (Buckland et al. 2001) as same as that adopted during the EIA study and pre-construction phase monitoring to allow fair comparison of marine mammal monitoring results.
6.2.1.2 Eight transect lines are set at Southeast Lantau survey area, including Shek Kwu Chau, waters between Shek Kwu Chau and the Soko Islands, inshore waters of Lantau Island (e.g. Pui O Wan) as well as southwest corner of Cheung Chau as shown in Figure 6.1 below:
|
Figure 6.1 Line Transects for Marine Mammal Surveys |
6.2.1.3 The surveys should cover all 4 seasons in order to take natural fluctuation and seasonal variations into account for data analysis of distribution, encounter rate, density and habitat use of both porpoises and dolphins (if any). In comparison to the baseline monitoring results, results from the analysed construction phase monitoring data would allow the detection of any changes of their usage of habitat, in response to the scheduled construction works. The monitoring surveys shall be conducted throughout the construction phase involving marine construction work with the frequency shown in Table 6.1 below:
Table 6.1 Vessel-based Line-transect Survey Frequency
Season |
Months |
Frequency |
Peak Season |
December, January, February, March, April & May |
Twice per month |
Non-peak Season |
June, July, August, September, October & November |
Once per month |
6.2.1.4 For each vessel survey, a 15-m inboard vessel with an open upper deck (about 4.5 m above water surface) would be used to make observations from the flying bridge area. Two experienced marine mammal observers (a data recorder and a primary observer) would make up the on-effort survey team, and the survey vessel would transit different transect lines at a constant speed of 13-15 km per hour. The data recorder shall search with unaided eyes and fill out the datasheets, while the primary observer shall search for dolphins and porpoises continuously through 7 x 50 marine binoculars. Both observers shall search the sea ahead of the vessel, between 270o and 90o (in relation to the bow, which is defined as 0°). Two additional experienced observers shall be available on the boat to work in shift (i.e. rotate every 30 minutes) in order to minimize fatigue of the survey team members. All observers shall be experienced in small cetacean survey techniques and identifying local cetacean species with extensive training by marine mammal specialist of the ET.
6.2.1.5 During on-effort survey periods, the survey team shall record effort data including time, position (latitude and longitude), weather conditions (Beaufort sea state and visibility), and distance travelled in each series (a continuous period of search effort) with the assistance of a handheld GPS (Garmin eTrex Legend). Data including time, position and vessel speed would also be automatically and continuously logged by handheld GPS throughout the entire survey for subsequent review.
6.2.1.6 When porpoises or dolphins are sighted, the survey team shall end the survey effort, and immediately record the initial sighting distance and angle of the porpoise or dolphin group from the survey vessel, as well as the sighting time and position. Then the research vessel shall be diverted from its course to approach the animals for species identification, group size estimation, assessment of group composition, behavioural observations, and collection of identification photos (feasible only for Chinese White Dolphin). The perpendicular distance (PSD) of the porpoise or dolphin group to the transect line would then be calculated from the initial sighting distance and angle, which shall be used in the line-transect analysis for density and abundance estimation.
6.2.1.7 The line-transect survey data shall be integrated with a Geographic Information System (GIS) to visualize and interpret different spatial and temporal patterns of porpoise and dolphin distribution using their sighting positions collected from vessel surveys. Location data of porpoise and dolphin groups would be plotted on map layers of Hong Kong using a desktop GIS (e.g. ArcView© 3.1) to examine their distribution patterns in details. The encounter rate could be used as an indicator to determine areas or time periods of importance to porpoises within the study area. For encounter rate analysis of finless porpoises, only survey data collected under Beaufort 2 or below condition would be used for encounter rate analysis.
6.2.1.8 To take into account of the variations of survey effort across different sections within survey area, the quantitative grid analysis of habitat use would be conducted to examine finless porpoise usage among 1-km2 grids within the Southeast Lantau survey area. For the grid analysis, SPSE (sighting density) and DPSE (porpoise density) values would be deduced for evaluation on level of porpoise usage. First, positions of on-effort porpoise sightings from the study period are plotted onto 68 grids (1 km x 1 km each) within the survey area. Sighting density grids and porpoise density grids shall then be normalized with the amount of survey effort conducted within each grid. The total amount of survey effort spent on each grid shall be calculated by examining the survey coverage on each line-transect survey to determine how many times the grid had been surveyed during study period. With the amount of survey effort calculated for each grid, the sighting density and porpoise density of each grid shall be further normalized (i.e. divided by the unit of survey effort).
6.2.1.9 The newly-derived unit for sighting density was termed SPSE, representing the number of on-effort sightings per 100 units of survey effort. In addition, the derived unit for actual porpoise density was termed DPSE, representing the number of dolphins/porpoise per 100 units of survey effort. Among the 1-km2 grids that were partially covered by land, the percentage of sea area was calculated using GIS tools, and their SPSE and DPSE values were adjusted accordingly. The following formulae shall be used to estimate SPSE and DPSE in each 1-km2 grid within the study area:
SPSE = ((S / E) x 100) / SA%
DPSE = ((D / E) x 100) / SA%
where S = total number of on-effort sightings
D = total number of dolphins/porpoises from on-effort sightings
E = total number of units of survey effort
SA% = percentage of sea area
6.2.2 Passive Acoustic Monitoring (PAM)The PAM aims to study the usage of an area by Finless Porpoise by using an array of automated static porpoise detectors (e.g. C-POD) which would be deployed at different locations to detect the unique ultra-high frequency sounds produced by Finless Porpoise. During the construction period, the PAM survey will be conducted including placement of two passive porpoise detectors outside the Project Area as control site (i.e. within Pui O Wan and to the south of Tai A Chau) and one porpoise detector within the Project Area (i.e. near Shek Kwu Chau) as shown in Figure 6.2 below.
|
Table 6.2 PAM Deployment Period
Season |
Months |
Deployment Period |
Peak Season |
December, January, February, March, April or May |
At least 30 days during the peak months of porpoise occurrence in South Lantau waters |
6.2.3.1 The automated static porpoise detectors shall detect the presence and number of finless porpoise and Chinese White Dolphins respectively over the deployment period, with the false signal such as boat sonar and sediment transport noise distinguished and filtered out. The detectors shall be deployed and retrieved by professional dive team on the seabed of the three selected location shown in Figure 6.2. During each deployment, the C-POD unit serial numbers as well as the time and date of deployments shall be recorded. Information including the GPS positions and water depth at each of the deployment locations shall also be obtained.
6.2.3.2 The diel patterns (i.e. 24-hour activity pattern) of finless porpoise occurrence among the three sites at Shek Kwu Chau, Tai A Chau and Pui O Wan shall be analyzed. Peaks and troughs of finless porpoise occurrence per hour of day would be identified and compared with the results obtained from pre-construction monitoring.
6.2.4 Land-based Theodolite Tracking6.2.4.1 The Land-based Theodolite Tracking study would use the same station as in the AFCD monitoring study(same as the baseline monitoring location), which is situated at the southwest side of Shek Kwu Chau (GPS position: 22o11.47’ N and 113o59.33’ E) as shown in below Figure 6.3. The station was selected based on its height above sea level (at least 20 metres), close proximity to shore, and relatively unobstructed views of the entire Project Area to the southwest of Shek Kwu Chau. The height of the Shek Kwu Chau Station established by the HKCRP team is 74.6 m high at mean low water, and only a few hundred metres to the IWMF reclamation site, which is ideal for the purpose for the present behavioural and movement monitoring of finless porpoises as well during construction phase considering there as an un-obstructed vantage point at a height above the Project Site.
|
Figure 6.3 Locations of Land-based Theodolite Tracking |
Table 6.3 Land-based Theodolite Tracking Survey Period
Season |
Months |
Survey Period |
Peak Season |
December, January, February, March, April or May |
30 days during the peak months of porpoise occurrence in South Lantau waters |
6.2.4.2 The monitoring period for land-based theodolite tracking will be proposed to be overlapped with the PAM. The monitoring team consists of one experienced theodolite operator and at least two field observers for assistance. To conduct theodolite tracking, the observers will search systematically for Finless Porpoise using the unaided eye and 7 x 50 handheld binoculars on each survey day throughout the study area. When an individual or group of porpoises is located, a theodolite tracking session will be initiated and focal follow methods will be used to track the porpoise(s). Behavioural state data (i.e. resting, milling, travelling, feeding and socializing) shall also be recorded every 5 minutes for the focal individual or group. Positions of porpoises and boats shall be measured using a digital theodolite connected to a laptop computer. This tracking survey will be conducted during the peak season between December 2018 and May 2019 for 30 surveys spanning across 15-16 weeks during the peak season to provide good temporal coverage during the initial stage of the construction period.
6.3 Specific Mitigation Measures 6.3.1 Monitored exclusion zones6.3.1.1 During the installation/re-installation/relocation process of floating type silt curtains, in order to avoid the accidental entrance and entrapment of marine mammals within the silt curtains, a monitored exclusion zone of 250 m radius from silt curtain should be implemented. The exclusion zone should be closely monitored by an experienced marine mammal observer (MMO) for at least 30 minutes before the start of installation/re-installation/relocation process. If a marine mammal is noted within the exclusion zone, all marine works should stop immediately and remain idle for 30 minutes, or until the exclusion zone is free from marine mammals. The experienced marine mammal observer should be well trained to detect marine mammals. Binoculars should be used to search the exclusion zone from an elevated platform with unobstructed visibility. The marine mammal observer(s) shall be independent of the construction contractor and shall form part of the Environmental Team and have the power to call-off construction activities.
6.3.1.2 According to the Condition 2.25 of the FEP, MMEZ should be implemented during the installation/re-installation/relocation process of floating type silt curtains in order to avoid the accidental entrance and entrapment of marine mammals within the silt curtains. Also, marine construction works expected to produce underwater acoustic disturbance as per Condition 2.27 of the FEP, especially within December and May, would require the implementation of MMEZ, which currently all those specific construction activities have been replaced by less acoustically disturbing construction methods such as Deep Cement Mixing (DCM) and Precast Concrete Blocks Installation as discussed in Section 5.3 of the Detailed Monitoring Programme on Finless Porpoise, however, MMEZ would also be implemented for precautionary purpose for DCM works.
6.3.1.3 A MMEZ with 250 m distance from the boundary of a work area shall be established during the above situation. A typical MMEZ is indicated in Figure 6.4 for reference. The MMEZ serves as a monitoring approach to provide appropriate and immediate actions once finless porpoise or Chinese White Dolphin is sighted within the MMEZ. All MMEZ will be monitored by competent Marine Mammal Observers (MMOs) to be provided by the Environmental Team (ET) for the IWMF and trained by the Marine Mammal Monitoring Specialist of the ET who is independent from JV.
|
|
Figure 6.4 Illustration of Typical MMEZ |
6.3.1.4 Prior to the commencement of construction activity, our MMOs shall ensure the boundary of a marine work area and setting up of the MMEZ for the work area and get access to the monitoring location on a barge or a lookout point where there is no obstructed views for monitoring the MMEZ during the construction activity. The MMEZ shall be scanned thoroughly by a MMO for any presence of marine mammal e.g. finless porpoise for an initial period of 30 minutes. Construction activity shall only be commenced after the MMO has confirmed that the MMEZ is clear of the marine mammal for the initial period of 30 minutes. The MMO shall then inform the construction superintendent through mobile phone or handheld transceivers to certify the commencement of construction activity. The MMEZ monitoring shall be carried on throughout the period for all active construction activities requiring implementation of MMEZ.
6.3.1.5 When any mammal marine, e.g. Finless Porpoise, is detected by the MMO within the MMEZ during construction, the MMO shall inform the construction superintendent immediately through mobile phone or handheld transceivers to cease construction activity within the MMEZ. Construction activity shall not be re-commenced until the MMO confirms that the MMEZ is continuously clear of marine mammal for a period of 30 minutes. The MMO shall then inform the construction superintendent through mobile phone or handheld transceivers to certify the re-commencement of construction activity.
6.3.1.6 As there could be a number of Contractors working at the same time within a work area for the IWMF project, a full contact list of MMEZ monitoring team members of the ET and the relevant responsible construction superintendents of the Contractor at the site shall be prepared, updated regularly and circulated to all parties involved in the MMEZ monitoring. With a full contact list, our MMOs shall be able to find out the contacts of corresponding persons in case of marine mammal sighting within and near the MMEZ or emergent occurrence of any unpredictable impact on marine mammal.
6.3.1.7 If a marine mammal is still observed in close vicinity but outside the MMEZ, the MMO shall inform the construction superintendent about the presence of marine mammal. The MMO shall remain in position and closely observe the movement of the marine mammal as well as searching for the appearance of any other marine mammal within the MMEZ. No matter the marine mammal is observed within or in close vicinity but outside the MMEZ, the construction superintendent or relevant persons shall inform all vessel captains involved in construction activities around the MMEZ to pay special attention of the presence of the marine mammal in order to reduce chance of collision with them. In case of injury or live-stranded marine mammal being found within the MMEZ, the marine mammal observer shall immediately inform the construction superintendent to suspend construction activities within the works area and contact AFCD through “1823” marine mammal stranding hotline.
6.3.2 Marine mammal watching plan6.3.2.1 Upon the completion of silt curtain installation/re-installation/relocation, all marine works would be conducted within a fully enclosed environment within the silt curtain. Hence exclusion zone monitoring would no longer be required. Subsequently, a marine mammal watching plan would be implemented.
6.3.2.2 Before commencement of dredging/sand blanket laying work at each designated area, a trained MMO shall check whether position frame silt curtains are ready, well prepared and operated without any obvious damage. Also, the MMO shall confirm the presence of the relevant frontline staff of the main contractor or its sub-contractors and engineers on board to ensure the effective communication, coordination and implementation of the response plan in relation to any incidents involving marine mammals within the waters surrounded by the position frame type silt curtains and the work areas. Also, there are lookout points at an elevated level on each barge, clear and safe access at the edges of the derrick lighter/ flag-top barge for inspection during dredging/sand blanket laying works, provision of sufficient lighting is required if working at night.
6.3.2.3 During the operation, the inspection will be conducted daily. The MMO will walk along the edge of derrick lighter (DL) and flag-top barge (FB) along the position frame silt curtain or proper location without obstacles where appropriate to inspect the position frame silt curtain with naked eyes, the MMO will check that the position frame silt curtains are maintained in the correct positions with no obvious defects / entanglement and there is no observable muddy water passing through the position frame silt curtain system. Any floating refuse trapped by the silt curtain shall be removed as part of the regular inspection. For night inspection, spotlight will be used to provide sufficient brightness to assist the inspection in dark condition.
6.3.2.4 For the localized silt curtain re-deployment, MMO will conduct visual inspection to confirm that there is no presence of marine mammal within the localized silt curtain. Visual inspection will be conducted in every hour by MMO till confirming that there is not any marine mammal observed in the surrounding area of the frame type silt curtain. The duration will be subject to various conditions, e.g. weather or angle of observation. The works can only commence after confirming that the surrounding waters of the localized silt curtains has not contain any marine mammal. Thereafter, frontline staff, i.e. foremen, site agent, superintendents and engineers will assist our MMO in implementing the plan from the active work fronts within the waters surrounded by the silt curtains throughout the work period. The MMO will conduct regular check every 60 minutes to observe the presence of any marine mammal around the localized silt curtain or being trapped by the localized silt curtain. The MMOs will also check if the localized silt curtains are in correct positions.
6.3.2.5 The MMO shall fill up our Marine Mammal Sighting Record Sheet. After inspection, those records should be kept properly and submitted to the project team. In case there is any marine mammal being found, the MMO should carry out the response actions and communicate with relevant parties to stop and then resume work after the discovered marine mammal leaves. After lifting up and mobilization of silt curtain, the MMO will repeat the procedures of regular and visual inspection until the end of the construction works.
6.3.2.6 Each lookout point will have an unobstructed view to waters around the DL and FB. The MMO will move around the DL and FB to establish a clear and unobstructed view as much as they can without compromising the safety concern. When appropriate, the lookout point can be replaced by a proper location if unobstructed view can be assured.
6.4 Results and Observations 6.4.1 Vessel-based Line-transect Survey6.4.1.1 The monthly survey was conducted on 7 November 2019. As this is the designated off-peak season (June – November), one survey was completed. A total of 41.7 km on effort (transects only) survey length was completed, 73.6% of which was conducted at Beaufort Sea State 2 or better (Table 6.4). No sightings were recorded.
Table 6.4 Summary of Vessel-based Line-transect Survey Effort
Date |
Area* |
Beaufort |
Effort (km) |
Season |
Vessel |
Effort Type** |
7 Nov 2019 |
SEL |
2 |
30.7 |
WINTER |
SMRUHK |
P |
3 |
11.0 |
WINTER |
SMRUHK |
P |
* As shown in Figure. 6.1
** P (from AFCD) denotes the ON EFFORT survey on the transect line, not the adjoining passages
6.4.1.2 A review of the long term AFCD marine mammal monitoring programme, the EIA and the pre-construction baseline monitoring report for this project was conducted. Pre-construction baseline monitoring was conducted in Feb - Apr 2018 and the EIA was conducted during the peak porpoise months (Dec 2008 to May 2009) and are not comparable to the survey month of November. The AFCD long term monitoring data and November 2018 impact survey result can be compared directly to November 2019 Impact Survey results. It is noted that the 5th month of impact monitoring is November 2018 and these data are included.
6.4.1.3 A review of the Beaufort Sea State in November survey conditions between 2009 and 2018 (only data available from AFCD at time of writing; (AFCD 20181; 20172; 20163; 20154; 20145; 20136; 20127; 20118; 20109) and Impact 2018) show that between 0% and 100 % of survey effort has been conducted at Beaufort Sea State 2 or better in the past. For this project in November 2019, 73.6 % of the survey was conducted at Beaufort Sea State 2 or better and, as such, survey conditions in November 2019 were typical of previous AFCD surveys.
6.4.1.4 A review of the porpoise sightings in the survey area for November between 2009-2018 indicate that there are fluctuations between the number of sightings usually recorded. 2 years recorded no (0) sightings (2009 and 2012 conducted by AFCD), 6 years recorded 1 sighting (2010, 2011, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2017 conducted by AFCD) and 1 year recorded four (4) sightings (2016 conducted by AFCD). Effort varied considerably between years and the average number of sightings (per km) varied between 0 and 0.03 km-1. There is no trend in encounter rates recorded by the AFCD long term monitoring programme, i.e., the highest encounter rate was recorded in 2011, 2014 and 2016 at 0.03 sightings km-1 (1, 1 and 4 sightings, respectively), with encounter rates of 0 sightings km-1, in 2009 and 2012. For November 2018 conducted by ET, an encounter rate of 0.03 sightings km-1 is calculated, which is equal to the highest encounter rate recorded for this month previously, with reference to the AFCD long term marine mammal monitoring data. It must be highlighted that the very small survey area conducted for this monitoring typically result in 0 to 1 sighting per survey.
6.4.1.5 The impacts of the Project on marine mammals as predicted in the EIA were that construction activities would cause individuals to move away from the area. With only a small area being surveyed by vessels, with no control area, and as porpoise density is obviously low in such a small area, it is difficult to discern significant changes in sightings occurrence from vessel surveys alone. The sightings data presented in AFCD long term monitoring reports indicate that a sighting rate of 0 for the month of November is not unusual. It is noted that the encounter rate for November 2019 is similar to the impact monitoring result of November 2018, prior to early construction stage at SKC, however, as sightings are rare in this month it is difficult to draw conclusions about impacts.
6.4.2 PAM and Land-based Theodolite Tracking6.4.2.1 30 days of PAM surveys were started at 1 May 2019 and completed until the end of May 2019. Multiple PAM systems were deployed at three sites. The PAM system located at the IWMF was lost, however, an alternative data set has been identified. The PAM systems at the two control sites Tai A Chau and Pui O were recovered on 3 August 2019. A summary of marine mammal detections shows that porpoise were recorded every day of deployment at each site, but at varying frequencies. Per the latest update from the specialist, detailed theodolite result is presented in Appendix Q while the PAM result is under reviewing by the marine mammal specialist and it shall be presented in 18th Monthly EM&A report (December 2019).
6.4.2.2 Whereas detailed diurnal analyses are still underway, each PAM site, including that adjacent to the Project site, records acoustic detections every day during PAM deployment, at varying frequencies. A comparison to baseline monitoring will be presented in subsequent reports.
Table 6.5 The total number of Finless Porpoise and Chinese White Dolphin acoustic detections
Location |
No. of Days Detections_FP |
No. FP_Detections |
No. of Days Detections_CWD |
No. CWD_Detections |
Pui O |
42 (every day) |
773 |
1 |
1 |
Tai A Chau |
42 (every day) |
247 |
0 |
0 |
Shek Kwu Chau |
37 (every day) |
258 |
0 |
0 |
6.4.2.3 Theodolite surveys were completed in May 2019. In total, thirty four days of theodolite tracking were completed between February - May 2019, comprising 167 hours and 49 minutes of observation. No Chinese white dolphin was observed and only one finless was recorded. The finless porpoise encounter rate was calculated as 0.006 finless porpoise per hour, in all weather conditions.
6.4.2.4 A total of 2620 vessels of ten different types were observed and tracked within or in the proximity of the IWMF construction site. These comprised fishing boats (236), speed boats (29), container boats (155), government boats (22), high speed ferries (53), others (13) and IWMF-Related construction platforms (974), tug boats(240), transportation boats (363), construction boats (531 and approximately 8 buoys were present marking the site boundary. The detailed Land-based Theodolite Tracking Report is presented in Appendix Q.
6.4.2.5 The baseline theodolite tracking was conducted immediately prior to and during the site preparation activities of the site. The baseline data records a decrease in porpoise sightings as site preparation activities commenced and notes that the decrease was most likely due to the onset of site preparation activities. The impact theodolite tracking conducted for this study records a marked increase in the number of Project related vessels and platforms and, in agreement with baseline conclusions, shows a concomitant decrease in finless porpoise sightings.
6.4.3 Specific Mitigation Measures Silt curtains were deployed for DCM during the reporting period. Teams of two MMO were on duty for continuous monitoring of the Marine Mammal Exclusion Zone (MMEZ) for DCM works, cluster MMEZ installation/re-installation/relocation process of silt curtains, and the marine mammal trapping checking and silt curtains inspection in accordance with the Detailed Monitoring Programme of Finless Porpoise and Marine Mammal Watching Plan respectively. Trainings for the MMO were provided by the ET prior to the aforementioned works, with a cumulative total of 98 individuals being trained and the training records kept by the ET. From the Marine Mammal Watching observation records and MMEZ monitoring log records, no Finless Porpoise or other marine mammals were observed within or around the MMEZ and silt curtains in the reporting month. 6.4.4 References1. Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD) 2018. Annual Marine Mammal Monitoring Programme April 2017-March 2018) The Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, Government of the Hong Kong SAR.
http://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/conservation/con_mar/con_mar_chi/con_mar_chi_chi/con_mar_chi_chi.html
2. Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD) 2017. Annual Marine Mammal Monitoring Programme April 2016-March 2017) The Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, Government of the Hong Kong SAR.
http://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/conservation/con_mar/con_mar_chi/con_mar_chi_chi/con_mar_chi_chi.html
3. Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD) 2016. Annual Marine Mammal Monitoring Programme April 2015-March 2016) The Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, Government of the Hong Kong SAR.
http://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/conservation/con_mar/con_mar_chi/con_mar_chi_chi/con_mar_chi_chi.html
4. Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD) 2015. Annual Marine Mammal Monitoring Programme April 2014-March 2015) The Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, Government of the Hong Kong SAR.
http://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/conservation/con_mar/con_mar_chi/con_mar_chi_chi/con_mar_chi_chi.html
5. Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD) 2014. Annual Marine Mammal Monitoring Programme April 2013-March 2014) The Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, Government of the Hong Kong SAR.
http://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/conservation/con_mar/con_mar_chi/con_mar_chi_chi/con_mar_chi_chi.html
6. Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD) 2013. Annual Marine Mammal Monitoring Programme April 2012-March 2013) The Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, Government of the Hong Kong SAR.
http://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/conservation/con_mar/con_mar_chi/con_mar_chi_chi/con_mar_chi_chi.html
7. Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD) 2012. Annual Marine Mammal Monitoring Programme April 2011-March 2012) The Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, Government of the Hong Kong SAR.
http://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/conservation/con_mar/con_mar_chi/con_mar_chi_chi/con_mar_chi_chi.html
8. Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD) 2011. Annual Marine Mammal Monitoring Programme April 2010-March 2011) The Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, Government of the Hong Kong SAR.
http://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/conservation/con_mar/con_mar_chi/con_mar_chi_chi/con_mar_chi_chi.html
9. Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD) 2010. Annual Marine Mammal Monitoring Programme April 2009-March 2010) The Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, Government of the Hong Kong SAR.
http://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/conservation/con_mar/con_mar_chi/con_mar_chi_chi/con_mar_chi_chi.html
7. White-Bellied Sea Eagle 7.1 Monitoring Requirement 7.1.1 On Shek Kwu Chau Island, a nest of WBSE is located about 60 m above ground within a hillside shrubland habitat, 130 m in-land from shore, about 550 m away from the proposed reclaimed land, with no human access. 3 phases monitoring programme will be comprised of pre-construction phase, construction phase and operation phase. 7.1.2 The Pre-Construction WBSE monitoring was started on 30 January 2018 and the location of WBSE nest was confirmed on 21 February 2018 and it is located at the western part of SKC Island (Figure 7.1). Two adults and two chicks were also recorded on 5th March 2018 survey till the end of the Pre-construction monitoring on 15th May 2018. Construction Phase monitoring were carried out followed by the commencement of the Construction Phase on 28th June 2018. 7.2 WBSE Monitoring Parameters, Time, Frequency 7.2.1 The objective of the construction phase monitoring should be to verify the utilisation of the area by WBSE, their responses to construction disturbance, as well as the effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures. Throughout the construction phase, field surveys should be conducted twice per month during their core breeding season (from December to May), and once per month outside their core breeding season (from June to November). The monitoring frequency should be increased to weekly during the incubation period of each year. In order to confirm their foraging ground near the construction site, it is necessary to conduct daily monitoring during the first week of nestling period in each year. 7.2.2 Since the location of the WBSE nest was located at the southwest of SKC within the hillside shrubland, it is impossible to observe the eggs during incubation period. Therefore, monitoring with increased frequency during incubation period could not be carried out. Daily monitoring will be carried out once any chick is recorded during the monitoring day. The monitoring schedule during the reporting period is provided in Appendix C. 7.3 Monitoring Location 7.3.1 Since there are no suitable land footings along the coast of SKC, only boat surveys were conducted. On Shek Kwu Chau Island, a nest of WBSE is located about 60 m above ground within a hillside shrubland habitat, 130 m in-land from shore, about 550 m away from the proposed reclaimed land, with no human access. 7.4 Monitoring Methodology 7.4.1 Information to be collected included feeding, perching/roosting, preening, soaring, flying, nesting and territorial guarding and the time spent on each activity. The responses and reactions to any disturbance to the WBSEs were also recorded and examined in conjunction with the construction noise and/or other events in the vicinity. Other disturbances such as weather condition, or invasion by other fauna species were also recorded. 7.4.2 Binocular, scope, camera, lens and GPS device used are summarized as Table 7.1 below:
Table 7.1 List of Equipment Used during Construction Phase Monitoring
Equipment |
Quantity |
Swarovski EL 8.5 x 42 Binocular |
1 |
Swarovski EL Range 8 x 42 Binocular |
1 |
Swarovski ATX 25-60 x 85 Spotting Scope |
1 |
Canon 1Dx Mark II Camera |
1 |
Canon EF300mm F2.8 Lens with Canon 2x Teleconverter |
1 |
Canon PowerShot G7X Camera |
1 |
Garmin GPSMAP 64S |
1 |
Table 7.2 Weather Conditions during the WBSE Monitoring
Date |
Condition |
Temperature (℃) |
27th November 2019 |
- North wind force 4 to 5 - Sunny |
16 |
|
Figure 7.1 Location of WBSE Nest on SKC |
|
Adult WBSEs staying in the nest |
Figure 7.2 Photo Records of WBSE on SKC During the Reporting Period |
Figure 8.1 Environmental Complaint Handling Procedures
8.2 No exceedance of the Action and Limit Levels of the regular construction noise and WBSE monitoring was recorded during the reporting period.Table 8.1 Summary of SS Compliance Status at Impact Stations (Mid-Ebb Tide)
Date |
B1 |
B2 |
B3 |
B4 |
CR1 |
CR2 |
F1A |
H1 |
S1 |
S2A |
S3 |
M1 |
1-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. of SS Exceedances |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
Note 1: Detailed results are presented in Appendix D
Legend:
|
No exceedance of Action Level and Limit Level |
|
Exceedance of Action Level recorded at monitoring station located downstream of the Project based on dominant tidal flow |
|
Exceedance of Action Level recorded at monitoring station located upstream/unrelated stream (neither upstream nor downstream, far away) of the Project based on dominant tidal flow |
|
Exceedance of Limit Level recorded at monitoring station located downstream of the Project based on dominant tidal flow |
|
Exceedance of Limit Level recorded at monitoring station located upstream/unrelated stream of the Project based on dominant tidal flow |
|
Upstream/unrelated stream station with respect to IWMF Project during the respective tide based on dominant tidal flow |
|
Downstream station with respect to IWMF Project during the respective tide based on dominant tidal flow/station within the Project site |
|
NA for measurement |
|
Cancelled due to incident or adverse weather |
Table 8.2 Summary of SS Compliance Status at Impact Stations (Mid-Flood Tide)
Date |
B1 |
B2 |
B3 |
B4 |
CR1 |
CR2 |
F1A |
H1 |
S1 |
S2A |
S3 |
M1 |
1-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. of SS Exceedances |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
Note 1: Detailed results are presented in Appendix D
Legend:
|
No exceedance of Action Level and Limit Level |
|
Exceedance of Action Level recorded at monitoring station located downstream of the Project based on dominant tidal flow |
|
Exceedance of Action Level recorded at monitoring station located upstream/unrelated stream (neither upstream nor downstream, far away) of the Project based on dominant tidal flow |
|
Exceedance of Limit Level recorded at monitoring station located downstream of the Project based on dominant tidal flow |
|
Exceedance of Limit Level recorded at monitoring station located upstream/unrelated stream of the Project based on dominant tidal flow |
|
Upstream/unrelated stream station with respect to IWMF Project during the respective tide based on dominant tidal flow |
|
Downstream station with respect to IWMF Project during the respective tide based on dominant tidal flow/station within the Project site |
|
NA for measurement |
|
Cancelled due to incident or adverse weather |
Table 8.3 Summary of DO Compliance Status at Impact Stations (Mid-Ebb Tide)
Date |
B1 |
B2 |
B3 |
B4 |
CR1 |
CR2 |
F1A |
H1 |
S1 |
S2A |
S3 |
M1 |
1-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. of DO Exceedances |
5 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
8 |
7 |
7 |
5 |
6 |
5 |
6 |
Note 1: Detailed results are presented in Appendix D
Legend:
|
No exceedance of Action Level and Limit Level |
|
Exceedance of Action Level recorded at monitoring station located downstream of the Project based on dominant tidal flow |
|
Exceedance of Action Level recorded at monitoring station located upstream/unrelated stream (neither upstream nor downstream, far away) of the Project based on dominant tidal flow |
|
Exceedance of Limit Level recorded at monitoring station located downstream of the Project based on dominant tidal flow |
|
Exceedance of Limit Level recorded at monitoring station located upstream/unrelated stream of the Project based on dominant tidal flow |
|
Upstream/unrelated stream station with respect to IWMF Project during the respective tide based on dominant tidal flow |
|
Downstream station with respect to IWMF Project during the respective tide based on dominant tidal flow/station within the Project site |
|
NA for measurement |
|
Cancelled due to incident or adverse weather |
Table 8.4 Summary of DO Compliance Status at Impact Stations (Mid-Flood Tide)
Date |
B1 |
B2 |
B3 |
B4 |
CR1 |
CR2 |
F1A |
H1 |
S1 |
S2A |
S3 |
M1 |
1-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29-11-2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. of DO Exceedances |
7 |
7 |
7 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
6 |
5 |
7 |
8 |
6 |
7 |
Note 1: Detailed results are presented in Appendix D
Legend:
|
No exceedance of Action Level and Limit Level |
|
Exceedance of Action Level recorded at monitoring station located downstream of the Project based on dominant tidal flow |
|
Exceedance of Action Level recorded at monitoring station located upstream/unrelated stream (neither upstream nor downstream, far away) of the Project based on dominant tidal flow |
|
Exceedance of Limit Level recorded at monitoring station located downstream of the Project based on dominant tidal flow |
|
Exceedance of Limit Level recorded at monitoring station located upstream/unrelated stream of the Project based on dominant tidal flow |
|
Upstream/unrelated stream station with respect to IWMF Project during the respective tide based on dominant tidal flow |
|
Downstream station with respect to IWMF Project during the respective tide based on dominant tidal flow/station within the Project site |
|
NA for measurement |
|
Cancelled due to incident or adverse weather |
9. EM&A Site Inspection 9.1 Site inspections were carried out on a weekly basis to monitor the implementation of proper environmental pollution control and mitigation measures under the Contract. In the reporting period, site inspections were carried out on 4, 15, 19 & 26 November 2019 at the site portions list in Table 9.1 below. Due to unforeseeable traffic disruption on 12 November 2019, representative of ET was not able to join the site inspection. The supplemented site inspection was carried out on 15 November 2019 by ET and the Contractor.
Table 9.1 Site Inspection Record
Date |
Inspected Site Portion |
Time |
4 November 2019 |
Portion 1, 1A & 1B (near SKC) |
20:50 – 21:30 PM |
15 November 2019 |
Portion 1, 1A & 1B (near SKC) |
13:30 – 14:30 PM |
19 November 2019 |
Portion 1, 1A & 1B (near SKC) |
10:30 – 11:50 AM |
26 November 2019 |
Portion 1, 1A & 1B (near SKC) |
10:10 – 11:30 AM |
Table 9.2 Site Observations
Date |
Environmental Observations |
Follow-up Status |
4 November 2019 (Site inspection) |
Observation(s) and Recommendation(s) 1. No boarding was success. |
Nil
|
15 November 2019 (Site inspection) |
Observation(s) and Recommendation(s) 1. Silt curtain for coral protection at location B, D, A was found broken. 2. Small amount of sediment was found at the edge of UDL-2. Sediment should be cleaned to prevent falling into the sea. |
1. The floating type silt curtains are under maintenance. They will be repaired prior to adopt new dredging and filling rate. 2. Sediment had been cleaned at the edge of UDL-2. |
19 November 2019 (Site inspection) |
Observation(s) and Recommendation(s) 1. There was no major observation. |
Nil. |
26 November 2019 (Site inspection) |
Observation(s) and Recommendation(s) 1. On 宏建1, small amount of sediment was found at the edge of the barge. Sediment should be cleaned to prevent fall. |
1. Sediment cleared.
|
10. Future Key Issues 10.1 Works to be undertaken in the next reporting month are:
· Coring of DCM samples;
· Cone Penetration Test;
· Dredging Works and Sediment Disposal;
· Rock Filling of Foundation;
· Leveling Works for the Foundation of Seawall and Berth Area;
· Caisson Laying;
· Rubble Mound Laying;
· Sand Blanket and Geotextile Laying.
10.2 Potential environmental impacts arising from the above construction activities are mainly associated with water quality, construction noise, waste management and ecology. 10.3 The key environmental mitigation measures for the Project in the coming reporting period expected to be associated with the construction activities include:· Reduction of noise from equipment and machinery on-site;
· Installation of silt curtains for DCM installation, sand blanket laying works and dredging works;
· Sorting, recycling, storage and disposal of general refuse and construction waste;
· Management of chemicals and avoidance of oil spillage on-site, especially under heavy rains and adverse weather; and
· Implementation of cluster MMEZ and inspection of enclosed environment within silt curtains as per DMPFP;
· Regulation on rate and means for dredging works as stipulated in FEP Clause 2.17 – 2.21 or the approved Supporting Document for Reviewing Dredging Rate and Filling Rate, whichever is applicable;
· Daily site audit and monitoring by ET during dredging work as stipulated in FEP Clause 2.21A;
· Storage, handling and disposal of dredged materials according to Dumping At Sea Ordinance (DASO);
· Confirmation of the absence of silt content in the rock filling material and the filling work is properly conducted;
· Installation process of floating silt curtain according to approved Silt Curtain Deployment Plan
10.4 The tentative schedule of regular construction noise, water quality and ecology monitoring in the next reporting period is presented in Appendix P. The regular construction noise, water quality and ecology monitoring will be conducted at the same monitoring locations in the next reporting period.